Child Disability Payment decision making guide

If there has been an increase in level of entitlement

This section covers scenarios where the individual reports a change of circumstances that leads to an increase in their level of entitlement.

If the individual both

  • returns their review pack and reports an increase in need that leads to an increase in entitlement,
  • has already met the backwards test for this increase,

their change in entitlement will take effect on the date the case manager makes the determination without application (CDP regs, reg. 28(1)(d)).

Individuals must satisfy the backwards test before they can become entitled to an increased rate of CDP when their award is reviewed. For more information on the backwards test please refer to the Backwards and Forwards Tests chapter. Reference should also be made to the ‘Change of circumstances: change in mobility or care needs’ chapter for guidance on applying the backwards test appropriately.

Setting an earlier start date if it would be unjust not to do so

There are circumstances that would make it unjust not to set an earlier date for the increase in entitlement to take effect (CDP regs, reg. 28(2)).

Case managers should make the decision

  • whether it would be unjust not to set an earlier date
  • what that earlier date should be,

based on information already available to them. This could be, for example, through details provided on the client’s review form or further information provided later in a redetermination form.

One scenario where it would be unjust not to set an earlier start date would be where both:

  • the award review has been delayed
  • the delay was caused by Social Security Scotland

Examples of scenarios where Social Security Scotland is responsible for delays in reviewing a case include:

  • forms or documents submitted by the individual as part of their review have got lost
  • pre-review notifications or review packs were not sent out on time
  • after completed review forms have been received, reviews are concluded more than 12 weeks after their review date

This list is not exhaustive.

The case manager must refer to the relevant operational guidance chapter where processing has been delayed and DMG chapter when deciding whether setting an earlier date would be appropriate.

Another scenario would be where the client reaches out to Social Security Scotland to explain that they didn’t notice the change, or have a good reason not to have reported it within a reasonable timeframe due to, for example:

  • impacts of their condition or overall health
  • bereavement
  • a hospital stay

This list is not exhaustive.

If a case manager is uncertain about whether it would be unjust to not set an earlier date for a change of entitlement, they should seek advice from their decision team manager.

Sign up to our newsletter

If you are an organisation or individual who works with people who may need information or support on any of our benefits, sign up to our stakeholder newsletter.

We'll never send you content you haven’t asked for and you can opt out at any time.

Please enter a valid email address

Read our privacy policy